|
Work
Capacity Functional Loss - Brain And
Nervous System – Disability # 1. - 1.
Evaluation
of Industrial Disability (Packard Thurber,
MD)- 8 CCR 46/9725: Physician
must report measurable physical elements of disability in accordance with the
standard method as described in the book. (Page 61 and Instruction IV on
pages 10 &11.) a.
Brain
and Nervous System impairments: Head injuries residuals, including
headaches, the medical report should: include a complete description of
precipitating circumstances, frequency, duration and intensity of such
factors as vertigo, impairment of memory, impairment of concentration,
headaches, fatigability, nervousness, and irritability, together with the
means necessary for relief. b. Functional Loss due to Brain and Nervous
System impairments
can be reported with an indication of the degree of severity
[level/magnitude] as defined by 8 CCR 9727.
i.
Descriptions
of disability must demonstrate an understanding of the magnitude criteria for
pain, how the pain affects performance/ability to work, rather than
how severely the injured worker perceives the symptoms. This fundamental principle must be applied
in the description of any type of subjective residuals be they
neuromusculoskeletal or due to brain and nervous system impairment
[neuro-psycho-physiological].
ii.
The
Schedule allows the use of Multiple Indexes of Disability to address
the impairment manifestations of an industrial injury. The fundamental rule is that they are
never aggregated or combined and, ultimately, the index producing the greater
rating is used.
iii.
In cases in which disability is
described as both a ‘weighed impairment based on The 8 Work Functions’
or as a weighted degree of severity, only the index producing the
greater rating is used. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 |
03 |
05 |
08 |
10 |
13 |
15 |
20 |
25 |
30 |
35 |
40 |
45 |
50 |
55 |
60 |
65 |
70 |
75 |
80 |
85 |
90 |
95 |
100 |
||
|
Cognitive Disorders |
|
< Slight |
|
Moderate
=
|
|
|
Severe = |
|
|
Pronounced = |
|||||||||||||||
|
Are considered organic mental disorders
such as delirium, dementia, amnesia or other similar disorders. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Epilepsy |
|
< Slight |
Slight-to-Moderate
=
|
|
|
Moderate = |
|
|
Severe = |
||||||||||||||||
|
Consideration should be given to:
frequency, type and severity of episodes, frequency and duration of
loss of consciousness; extent of mental impairment; type and severity of
other symptoms; presence or absence of aura;
effect of medication in controlling seizures; prognosis. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Headaches
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
< Slight |
|
< Moderate |
|
|
|
Severe = |
|
|
|
|
|
Pronounced = |
||||||||||||
|
Paralysis |
|
< Slight |
|
Moderate
=
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severe = |
|||||||||||||||
|
Post-Traumatic Head Syndrome |
|
< Slight |
|
Moderate
= |
|
|
|
|
|
Severe = |
|||||||||||||||
|
May include the
following factors: vertigo, impairment of memory, impairment of
concentration, headaches, fatigability, nervousness, irritability, and
cognitive disorders. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Vertigo |
< Slight |
|
|
|
|
Moderate= |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severe = |
|||||||||||
|
Stand Alone Analogies: |
|
|
< No Emotional
Stress (10% Add-on to a Work Capacity Guideline) 1 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
<No Prolonged/Excessive Stress |
< No Driving, Working Near
Machinery Or Heavy Equipment. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
< No Undue
Emotional Stress (05%-Add-On to a Work Capacity
Guideline- Before Modification) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 Schedule Page 2-12 Note 30 – Defines
Restrictions Involving Emotional Stress |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© 1998 - Luis Pérez-Cordero |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Determining
a Rating Standard for Disability # 1.4 Pages 2-3 of The Rating
Schedule: Combined Weighted Values are rounded off to the
nearest whole number and the Standard Ratings must be one of the following
1, 2, 3, 5, 8, and 10, 13, 15, and thereafter to multiples of 5. For example: 17.49 is
rounded to 15 and 17.5 is rounded to 20.
Evaluation
Guidelines 8 CCR 43 (9726) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
< Weighted Values of The 8
Work Functions |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Health & Safety – California
Department of Motor Vehicles http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/hdbk/pgs79thru81healthandsafety.htm#pmconditions PHYSICAL AND MENTAL CONDITIONS PHYSICIANS
ARE REQUIRED TO REPORT Health and Safety Code Section
103900 requires physicians and surgeons to report patients at least 14
years of age who are diagnosed as having a lapses of consciousness or
dementia (mental disorders) conditions or related disorders. Although not
required by law, physicians may report any other condition when they believe
a patient cannot drive safely because of a medical condition. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Labor Code Section § 139.2 & California Code of Regulations 8 CCR 43 (8 CCR 9726) IMC
43 1. The
Impairment levels for the 8 Work Functions as outlined by 8 CCR 43/9726 need
to have a correlation to the clinical findings beyond an unbalanced listing
of non-correlated test-findings, unsupported complaints, assertions of
disability or an unexplained assignment of a ‘severity’ disability level.
(Rating Schedule Page 2-2, notes 1,2, 3, and, Page 2-3, notes 1,2,3.) 2.
In the same manner in which
Rating Standards for subjective factors of disability cannot be based
only on the patient’s complaints or assertions of disability, neither can the
supportive data for the validation of “Work Function Impairments” be only the
injured worker’s complaints or be based upon patient portrayal of behavior.
The medical history, the medical records and findings at the time of
examination [the physical objective/neurological findings, standardized
psychological testing] must clearly support the reasons of the physician’s
determination of residual psychiatric disability. a.
Support for the 8 Work Functions
must take into consideration the duplication & overlapping of factors of
disability when the psychological problems are due to ‘physical pain’ due to
orthopedic problems’ and the ‘orthopedist’ cannot find a relationship of the
reported pain to underlying pathological processes’. 3.
Great caution must be exerted to
avoid ‘medicalizing’ problems that
are not medical, or to indicate any mental dysfunction or neuro-psycho-physiological
impairment, where none really exists. a. Caution
must be taken not to artificially create impairment by taking everyday human
behavior and problems into the realm of neuro-psycho-physiological disorders
and/or medical jurisdiction by merely giving them the proper label and
code. b. ‘Everyday
behaviors’, ‘responses to life experiences’, or ‘normal’ physical, congenital
or educational inability should not become the only foundation or support for
neuro-physio-psychological impairments. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LPC (06-05-1998)Ó Copyrighted
Material No Part Of This Table May Be Reproduced, Reused, Republished Or
Transmitted In Any Form, Or Stored In A Data Base Or Retrieval System,
Without Written Permission. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Permanent
Disability Rating Specialist
Thursday, October 30, 2003